🎉 The #CandyDrop Futures Challenge is live — join now to share a 6 BTC prize pool!
📢 Post your futures trading experience on Gate Square with the event hashtag — $25 × 20 rewards are waiting!
🎁 $500 in futures trial vouchers up for grabs — 20 standout posts will win!
📅 Event Period: August 1, 2025, 15:00 – August 15, 2025, 19:00 (UTC+8)
👉 Event Link: https://www.gate.com/candy-drop/detail/BTC-98
Dare to trade. Dare to win.
Bitcoin faces the risk of time distortion attacks, and a new proposal may solve security vulnerabilities.
Bitcoin Security Risks: Time Warp Attack
Overview
On March 26, 2025, a Bitcoin developer proposed a new improvement proposal known as the "Major Consensus Cleanup" soft fork plan. This upgrade aims to address several long-standing vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the Bitcoin protocol. One of the more serious vulnerabilities is referred to as the "Time Warp Attack," which is the focus of this article.
Bitcoin Block Timestamp Protection Mechanism
Before discussing time distortion attacks, let's first review the current time manipulation protection rules:
Median past time ( MPT ) rule: The block timestamp must be later than the median time of the last eleven blocks.
Future block time rules: Based on the MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME constant, the block timestamp cannot be more than 2 hours ahead of the median time of the node peers. The allowed maximum discrepancy between the time provided by the node and the local system clock is 90 minutes, serving as an additional security safeguard.
The MPT rules ensure that blocks do not revert too far into the past, while the future block rules prevent them from going too far into the future. It is worth noting that mechanisms similar to the future block rules cannot be implemented to prevent blocks from having past timestamps, as this could affect the initial blockchain synchronization. Time distortion attacks involve forging timestamps to make them appear to be far back in the past.
Calculation Errors in the Original Code
There is a minor but noteworthy computational error in the Bitcoin protocol. When calculating the mining difficulty adjustment, the protocol uses 2016 blocks as the basis for calculation, whereas it should actually use an interval of 2015 blocks. This results in the target time being 0.05% longer than it should be, making the actual target block interval for Bitcoin 10 minutes and 0.3 seconds, instead of a full 10 minutes.
Although the 0.3-second error has a minor overall impact, it is associated with another more serious issue. The difficulty calculation is based on the first and last blocks within each 2016 block window, which is flawed. A more reasonable approach should be to calculate the time difference between the last block of the previous 2016 block window and the last block of the current window.
Time Warp Attack Principle
Time-warp attacks exploit the above computational errors. In an ideal scenario, assuming mining is completely centralized, an attacker could manipulate the block timestamp in the following way:
This operation will cause the blockchain time to gradually lag behind real time, while the difficulty continues to increase. However, at the end of each difficulty adjustment period, the difficulty will trigger a downward adjustment due to the last block using the real timestamp. As the attack continues, the difficulty will significantly decrease, allowing the attackers to create blocks at an extremely fast rate, potentially acquiring a large amount of Bitcoin.
Feasibility and Challenges of Attacks
Although this type of attack is theoretically destructive, it faces many challenges in implementation:
Potential Solutions
To fix this vulnerability, there are several possible solutions:
In the latest "Great Consensus Cleanup" proposal, it is recommended to adopt a 2-hour time limit. This limit is about 0.6% of the target time for the difficulty adjustment cycle and can effectively limit the extent to which difficulty can be manipulated.
By implementing these improvements, the Bitcoin network will be better able to resist time distortion attacks, further enhancing its security and stability.