📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ
The Price Mechanism and Risk Management of Perptual Futures Trading: A Comparative Analysis of Three Major Platform Models
In-Depth Analysis: The Price Mechanism and Market Philosophy Behind Perpetual Futures Trading
Introduction: A Contract Storm Reveals the Battle Between Centralization and Decentralization
In March 2025, the JELLYJELLY contract triggered a market upheaval on a decentralized trading platform. Within just a few hours, the contract price soared by 429%, nearing a large-scale liquidation. If liquidation occurs, short positions will be forced into the on-chain liquidity vault, resulting in massive floating losses. Meanwhile, a centralized exchange quickly launched JELLYJELLY's Perptual Futures trading.
At the brink of a crisis, validators on decentralized platforms urgently voted to intervene, forcibly delisting, liquidating, and freezing transactions. This incident not only sparked intense discussions within the crypto community but also exposed a core issue: what exactly determines prices on decentralized trading platforms? Who bears the risks?
This article will use this event as a starting point to analyze the algorithmic differences in the core mechanisms of perpetual futures — index price, mark price, and funding rate — among the three major trading platforms, and delve into the financial philosophy and risk transmission mechanisms behind them.
Perptual Futures Trading Overview
Perptual Futures trading mainly consists of three key elements:
Comparison of Price Mechanisms of Three Major Platforms
Index Price/Oracle Price
A certain decentralized platform uses oracle prices, independently constructed by validator nodes, employing a weighted median method to resist extreme price fluctuations. This method is more resistant to manipulation, but the update frequency is relatively slow (once every 3 seconds).
Price Mechanism
The mark price algorithm of a certain centralized platform A is based on the median of three types of prices: the mid-price of the contract market's best bid/ask, the transaction price, and the impact price. The median constructed after EMA processing ensures that the mark price changes smoothly and is resistant to spikes.
A certain centralized platform B adopts a more aggressive approach, using only the mid-price of the bid-ask spread as the source for the mark price. This algorithm is extremely sensitive to small trades and can easily cause severe fluctuations.
The marked price structure of a certain decentralized platform integrates the two aforementioned methods, controlled by multiple nodes, taking into account oracle prices, internal platform prices, and the perpetual average prices from multiple exchanges.
Funding Rate Algorithm
A certain decentralized platform has introduced a premium index based on the model of a centralized platform A, using oracle prices instead of index prices. To compensate for the slow price rebound, the platform has set a higher funding rate cap and charges funding fees on an hourly basis.
The funding rate of a centralized platform A relies on a longer settlement period, calculated in conjunction with the order book Depth and borrowing rates, aiming to provide institutional investors with stable funding costs.
The funding rate algorithm of a centralized platform B is relatively simple, calculated based on the deviation of the market price, with a longer settlement period, but it is highly volatile.
Trading Strategies and Financial Philosophy Adapted to Different Platforms
Centralized Platform A: The Design of Rational Institutions
A centralized platform B: The design of trading instinct.
A certain decentralized platform: Design of on-chain structuralists
Conclusion: The End of Algorithms is the Human Heart
The design of the price mechanisms of different trading platforms reflects their respective ways of building trust in the market. Whether through institutional buffers, market behavior supremacy, or on-chain consensus, they all attempt to address the core question of how to trust an invisible market.
However, in extreme cases, human factors are still inevitable. Ultimately, the price is not determined by algorithms, but by whom we choose to believe to decide. Every trader should be responsible for their own values and maintain a sense of awe towards the market.