📢 Gate廣場 #MBG任务挑战# 發帖贏大獎活動火熱開啓!
想要瓜分1,000枚MBG?現在就來參與,展示你的洞察與實操,成爲MBG推廣達人!
💰️ 本期將評選出20位優質發帖用戶,每人可輕鬆獲得50枚MBG!
如何參與:
1️⃣ 調研MBG項目
對MBG的基本面、社區治理、發展目標、代幣經濟模型等方面進行研究,分享你對項目的深度研究。
2️⃣ 參與並分享真實體驗
參與MBG相關活動(包括CandyDrop、Launchpool或現貨交易),並曬出你的參與截圖、收益圖或實用教程。可以是收益展示、簡明易懂的新手攻略、小竅門,也可以是現貨行情點位分析,內容詳實優先。
3️⃣ 鼓勵帶新互動
如果你的帖子吸引到他人參與活動,或者有好友評論“已參與/已交易”,將大幅提升你的獲獎概率!
MBG熱門活動(帖文需附下列活動連結):
Gate第287期Launchpool:MBG — 質押ETH、MBG即可免費瓜分112,500 MBG,每小時領取獎勵!參與攻略見公告:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46230
Gate CandyDrop第55期:CandyDrop x MBG — 通過首次交易、交易MBG、邀請好友註冊交易即可分187,500 MBG!參與攻略見公告:https://www.gate.com/announcements
Smart contract devs think AI code will make crypto safer despite vibe coding fears
Smart contract developers and auditors told Cointelegraph that artificial intelligence usage in programming will make crypto safer despite earlier reports suggesting that AI-generated code may introduce new security risks.
A November 2024 report by the Center for Security and Emerging Technology warned that AI-assisted programming can be detrimental for cybersecurity. The paper suggests that AI generates insecure code, and models themselves are vulnerable to attacks and manipulation.
The researchers also noted that generated code may have downstream impacts by ending up in codebases that future AIs are trained on. “Our evaluation results show that almost half of the code snippets produced by these five different models contain bugs,” they stated.
Related: Crypto hacks surpass $3.1B in 2025 as access flaws persist: Hacken
AI augments, but doesn’t replace developers
Developers interviewed by Cointelegraph said AI tools are being used to supplement, not replace, programmers.
0xAw, the pseudonymous lead developer at Base decentralized exchange, Alien Base, told Cointelegraph that he uses AI “mostly as a tool to get quick reference checks on how to do something.”
0xAw said that he uses AI to produce “cookie-cutter” code. He recognized that with recent models, he has started “up to the idea of letting it do quick sanity checks on the code.” “It now works for the really obvious stuff,” he said.
Anton Holovchenko, a senior blockchain developer at Hacken, told Cointelegraph that he uses Cursor, an integrated development environment with AI features, for his work. He uses it for auto-completions and templating to “explain which type of contract replacement you need, and that’s it.”
Still, Holovchenko noted that the programmer should adjust the code for their needs and fix AI mistakes. He highlighted that he uses AI for templating, not vibe coding — a new term often referring to letting AI code independently, with limited human oversight.
Related: Microsoft publishes emergency patches for its SharePoint software amid attacks
AI is common in smart contract programming
0xAw said that everybody he knows used AI for programming “to some extent, but usually as an assistant tool.”
He said, AI tools are great time savers for senior programmers, but are usually “too imprecise to do all the work themselves.”
Mike Tiutin, blockchain architect and chief technology officer at crypto forensics firm AMLBot, told Cointelegraph that the prevalence of AI use is “quite high.”
Holovchenko said that “almost every developer” he knows uses some AI tools, with most relying on ChatGPT and Cursor.
AI is expected to improve Web3 security
Holovchenko added that he believes the prevalence of AI-assisted programming will lead to higher-quality code when in the hands of competent programmers:
0xAw said he has noticed a trend of “junior devs using AI and thinking it can do everything for them” — often with bad results. Still, he believes that AI usage in Web3 programming is “fine” since “smart contract development requires so much testing and refinement” that bugs end up being corrected before deployment.
Instead, he raised concerns that junior developers might be unable to progress to senior roles if they excessively rely on AI tools.
Tiutin believes that AI tools will lead to “more protocols with stronger baseline security — meaning fewer careless mistakes.” He expects AI to lead to cost optimization in smart contract auditing companies without affecting the price, since what is being sold is the auditing firm’s reputation, not the audit itself.
“Audits are more about sharing responsibility than actual contract security,” he said.
Magazine: Outrage as $1.8B ‘DGCX’ crypto scam ringleader mocks victims: Asia Express